Measurement Criteria
1. 23 CFR 627.5 TEA-21
2.
3. Warranty Policy
510-002(P) issued
4. Warranty Guideline
published
Monitoring Method
1. Interview with
District Production Administrator, District Construction Engineer and
A.
Review District production/project development files
on a selection of Warranty Projects for conformance with the Warranty Guideline
using checklist.
B.
Review District construction files on a selection of
Warranty Projects for conformance with the tracking and reviews required as per
the specifications using checklist.
2. Visit at least one
Project, if available, that has a Warranty specification, and review using
checklist.
3. Document best
practices
1. All 12 Districts
will be reviewed each year.
Results Reported
1. Written report to
the District within 2 weeks of review.
2. Written summary
report published annually
Result Shared
Written annual report
to:
1. State Construction
Engineer
2. Deputy Director of
Construction Management.
3. Assistant Director
for Highway Management.
4. Administrator
Office of Construction
5. FHWA.
6. DDD, DCE, DHMA,
Office of Quality
Compliance Tracking
1. QAR files in the Division of Construction
Management.
Compliance Follow-up
1.
Review of District performance until improved to
desired level.
2.
Review
of District supplied corrective plan if warranted.
Deputy Director
Signature _______________________________________Date ____________
Quality Assurance Review
District: ______
Central Office Reviewer: ________________________ Date of Review: _________
District Highway
Management Administrator: ________________________________________
District Production
Administrator: ________________________________________
District Construction
Engineer: ________________________________________
District Warranty
Coordinator: ________________________________________
Review District
Production procedures for compliance to the Warranty Guidelines:
Does District correspondence regarding a past selection of warranty projects indicate review was completed in accordance with Guideline?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Does the District update Ellis with warranty information?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Warranty Project
Level Requirements:
Were Warranty provisions properly documented, and C85 completed in a timely manner? Days: __
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Are project personnel aware of the Warranty provisions?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Review District
tracking procedure
Does the District warranty coordinator have a clear understanding of the Policy and Guidelines?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Does the District have a tracking procedure for the scheduling of Warranty reviews, and method for notification of Contractors of the findings?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Has the District kept Central Office Construction up to date regarding the status of warranty reviews?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Has the District warranty coordinator keep clear records of C-85 dates, warranty Maintenance Bond, and Certificate of Insuirance?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Has the District warranty coordinator keep the Central Office Warranty Coordinator up to date monthly on completed project, and field reviews?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________